|
After the passage of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)
and No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), educators had to re-think how to best
teach students with disabilities. IDEA ensures students with disabilities have
access to general education curriculum and classes, while NCLB requires
states, districts, and schools to disaggregate their data for all student
subgroups to make adequate yearly progress (AYP). The laws increased
accessibility and accountability for special education, and underscored the
need for cross-departmental collaboration in schools.
In Birmingham Public Schools, there are 7,900 K–12 students, including 906 in
special education. Traditionally, special education was isolated—it offered
different curriculum for the remediation of skills, was physically set apart
from general education, and was measured by its own standards. In an effort to
break down barriers between special and general education, and to deliver
high-quality curriculum, instruction, and assessment for all students,
Birmingham Public Schools developed a strategy called Together for Kids.
Establishing a Common Vision
The district-wide adoption of a
common reading curriculum served as the initial catalyst for enhanced
collaboration between general and special education. Moving from a
district-created curriculum that varied from school-to-school to a
comprehensive, scientifically based curriculum that addressed the needs of all
learners had a profound effect on student achievement. An increased number of
special education students were able to integrate with their general education
peers, which ignited teacher dialogue between departments.
To further cross-department conversation, the curriculum director gathered
twenty enthusiastic special and general education teachers, school
psychologists, principals, and administrators representing all schools in the
district to form Together for Kids in 2005. The committee's first task was to
craft a thoughtful vision statement: "Our goal is a slow, progressive
enhancement of our ability to collect, analyze, and interpret data to guide
our decision making about student achievement." The beauty of this vision
statement is that it was established cross-departmentally based on a shared
belief that all educators shoulder the responsibility of educating all
students. It represented a change in culture.
Goal-setting
The Together for Kids committee agreed to gather
for a half-day meeting once a month and address one major project per year
that would benefit all students. After some lively discussion and
deliberation, the group settled on its first goal: the selection of an
assessment to best estimate kindergarten students' literacy risk. It's
imperative to differentiate kindergarten students with reading deficiencies
from those with cognitive or developmental issues who may qualify for special
education—tailoring instruction and intervention for all students promotes
reading success. Research indicates that at-risk students who are identified
early and receive additional instruction can accelerate their reading skills
and bridge the literacy gap.
Collaborating
Not surprisingly, members of the Together for
Kids committee had differing opinions regarding assessment—what was needed,
what was easy to implement, and what would benefit teachers and, ultimately,
students. It was like two different countries speaking two different languages
coming together, figuring out how to communicate with each other for the first
time.
Some were firm believers in administering a widely used assessment to all
kindergartners, while others wanted to use screening instruments and
assessments that accompanied the new curriculum. The two groups needed to
develop a common vocabulary on assessments to attain the goal of implementing
a district-wide screening for at-risk kindergartners.
To compromise, Together for Kids decided to administer a well-known assessment
in four schools, and the assessment that accompanied the curriculum in four
schools for one year. At end of the current school year, Together for Kids
will evaluate the information culled from both sets of assessments, solicit
feedback from general and special education teachers, and make a unified
recommendation on an assessment for district-wide implementation next year.
Although the assessment pilot is not a true scientific approach, it does
signify the strides that Together for Kids has made strengthening
cross-departmental relationships for the benefit of all students.
Future Planning
While the Together for Kids committee is
staying true to its focus on one significant issue per year, the team
mentality at regular group meetings has sparked discussion on next year's
goal: how to provide small-group, intense reading intervention to at-risk
Kindergartners that will be identified by the district's chosen assessment.
Other topics include delving into additional core subjects and establishing
protocols for increased cross-departmental collaboration.
Seven years ago, the Birmingham Public Schools' special education department
established the following core set of beliefs:
-
All students have a right to be educated in their home school
-
Children should be with same-age peers
-
Everyone shares the responsibility to support a child
-
Parents know their children best
-
All members from a community learn from one another
-
Potential is unlimited
-
Curriculum must be meaningful and differentiated for all students
-
Fostering independence dignifies the individual
-
Social skills can only be learned with social opportunities
-
All students are contributing members of the community
-
All behavior expectations should be age appropriate
-
Diversity is valued and celebrated
-
Fears can be overcome
This belief system has always served as a guide for the special education
department, but now it's truly embraced district-wide because of the Together
for Kids initiative. Lowering the wall between the general and special
education departments at Birmingham Public Schools is a model for how teamwork
can shape a district, and the ongoing collaboration will continue to benefit
all students.
|